Sample
Assessing the Effect of Source Credibility on Validation of Essays
The contemporary society is characterized by the proliferation of information from various sources, including Artificial Intelligence sources and humans with different levels of credibility. In the academic setting, these sources include students, AI programs, and professors, all of whom might influence perceptions, judgments, and the perceived depth of content based on their perceived credibility. This paper sheds light on the nuanced relationship between source credibility and the evaluation of information.
Continue reading this paper
The next section explains the methodology used in this research. This sample paper contains 1012 words and 4 pages. Unlock the full document to continue reading.
The Human Superiority effect is further supported by AL Zaabi et al. (2023), who, in a systematic review of the literature, argue that ChatGPT, a form of AI, outputs lack scientific positions, constitutes plagiarism, and violates the code of conduct for scientific publishing. Further, the author writes that ChatGPT's outputs lack critical thinking and the reasoning skills of a human being and can potentially be detrimental to the research and impede scientific advancement. This reflects the position that AI output is deemed less credible than human output.
Privileged sections hidden
The next section explains the methodology used in this research. This sample paper contains 1012 words and 4 pages. Unlock the full document to continue reading.
Finkel, M., & Krämer, N. C. (2022). Humanoid Robots – artificial. human-like. credible? Empirical comparisons of source credibility attributions between humans, humanoid robots, and non-human-like devices. International Journal of Social Robotics, 14(6), 1397–1411. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12369-022-00879-w
Foy, J. E., LoCasto, P. C., Briner, S. W., & Dyar, S. (2016). Would a madman have been so wise as this?” The effects of source credibility and message credibility on validation. Memory & Cognition, 45(2), 281–295. https://doi.org/10.3758/s13421-016-0656-1
Gierth, L., & Bromme, R. (2020). Beware of vested interests: Epistemic vigilance improves reasoning about scientific evidence (for some people). PLOS ONE, 15(4), e0231387. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0231387
Ilić, S., & Damnjanović, K. (2021). The effect of source credibility on bullshit receptivity. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 35(5), 1193–1205. https://doi.org/10.1002/acp.3852
Unlock Options
Visible sections are shown inline, while the locked sections stay gated until a valid payment transaction ID is confirmed.
