ClassWrites Better Grades Start Here
Cultural Dimensions Analysis Tool
Donate Support this Lab

Southeast Asia

Philippines Hofstede Cultural Dimensions

Philippines has its highest Hofstede score in Power Distance (94) and its lowest score in Long-Term Orientation (27). This profile within Southeast Asia shows how authority, identity, risk, time orientation, competition, and self-expression combine in one national cultural snapshot.

Country dimension analysis illustration
Cultural Dimensions Analysis Tool

At a glance

Dimension Scores at a Glance

PDI

Power Distance

Very hierarchical
94 / 120
#5 of 200 Global avg: 65.9 Southeast Asia avg: 76.4
IDV

Individualism

Leans collectivist
32 / 120
#92 of 203 Global avg: 35 Southeast Asia avg: 25.6
MAS

Masculinity

Moderate masculinity
64 / 120
#15 of 194 Global avg: 49.2 Southeast Asia avg: 48.7
UAI

Uncertainty Avoidance

Leans flexible
44 / 120
#173 of 205 Global avg: 60 Southeast Asia avg: 39.1
LTO

Long-Term Orientation

Very short-term oriented
27 / 120
#110 of 196 Global avg: 36.6 Southeast Asia avg: 48.4
IVR

Indulgence

Leans restrained
42 / 120
#106 of 193 Global avg: 47.9 Southeast Asia avg: 42.6

Practical implications

What This Means

Business

Philippines business analysis should start with the country score pattern rather than a single dimension. Its strongest signal is Power Distance (94), so negotiations, planning, and leadership expectations should be read through that lens. Lower uncertainty avoidance can make experimentation and flexible execution easier to discuss.

Education

For education and student research, Philippines is useful for comparing how cultural values shape classroom authority, group work, time horizons, and motivation. A higher power distance score suggests formal respect for teachers and institutional hierarchy may be important. Lower individualism points toward group belonging and shared responsibility.

Society

For social analysis, the profile helps explain broad patterns without reducing people to a score. A lower long-term orientation can place more weight on tradition, present obligations, and faster visible outcomes. The lowest score, Long-Term Orientation (27), is just as important because it shows where the country leans away from the high pole of the model.

Each dimension in context

Dimension Deep Dive

PDI

Power Distance

Philippines scores 94 on Power Distance, ranking #5 of 200 in the ClassWrites Hofstede dataset. That is 28.1 points above the global average and 17.6 points above the Southeast Asia regional average.

A very hierarchical profile on this dimension points toward clear hierarchy, respect for seniority, and more centralized authority. In practical analysis, this dimension is useful because it connects broad values to visible patterns in workplaces, classrooms, public institutions, and family expectations.

Use Power Distance as a comparison signal, not a stereotype. Hofstede scores describe national-level tendencies; individuals and organizations inside Philippines can differ sharply by region, class, generation, profession, and local history.

IDV

Individualism

Philippines scores 32 on Individualism, ranking #92 of 203 in the ClassWrites Hofstede dataset. That is 3 points below the global average and 6.4 points above the Southeast Asia regional average.

A leans collectivist profile on this dimension points toward group loyalty, relationship obligations, and decisions shaped by in-group expectations. In practical analysis, this dimension is useful because it connects broad values to visible patterns in workplaces, classrooms, public institutions, and family expectations.

Use Individualism as a comparison signal, not a stereotype. Hofstede scores describe national-level tendencies; individuals and organizations inside Philippines can differ sharply by region, class, generation, profession, and local history.

MAS

Masculinity

Philippines scores 64 on Masculinity, ranking #15 of 194 in the ClassWrites Hofstede dataset. That is 14.8 points above the global average and 15.3 points above the Southeast Asia regional average.

A moderate masculinity profile on this dimension points toward competition, performance, ambition, and visible achievement. In practical analysis, this dimension is useful because it connects broad values to visible patterns in workplaces, classrooms, public institutions, and family expectations.

Use Masculinity as a comparison signal, not a stereotype. Hofstede scores describe national-level tendencies; individuals and organizations inside Philippines can differ sharply by region, class, generation, profession, and local history.

UAI

Uncertainty Avoidance

Philippines scores 44 on Uncertainty Avoidance, ranking #173 of 205 in the ClassWrites Hofstede dataset. That is 16 points below the global average and 4.9 points above the Southeast Asia regional average.

A leans flexible profile on this dimension points toward comfort with ambiguity, experimentation, and lighter rule systems. In practical analysis, this dimension is useful because it connects broad values to visible patterns in workplaces, classrooms, public institutions, and family expectations.

Use Uncertainty Avoidance as a comparison signal, not a stereotype. Hofstede scores describe national-level tendencies; individuals and organizations inside Philippines can differ sharply by region, class, generation, profession, and local history.

LTO

Long-Term Orientation

Philippines scores 27 on Long-Term Orientation, ranking #110 of 196 in the ClassWrites Hofstede dataset. That is 9.6 points below the global average and 21.4 points below the Southeast Asia regional average.

A very short-term oriented profile on this dimension points toward respect for tradition, quick visible outcomes, and present social obligations. In practical analysis, this dimension is useful because it connects broad values to visible patterns in workplaces, classrooms, public institutions, and family expectations.

Use Long-Term Orientation as a comparison signal, not a stereotype. Hofstede scores describe national-level tendencies; individuals and organizations inside Philippines can differ sharply by region, class, generation, profession, and local history.

IVR

Indulgence

Philippines scores 42 on Indulgence, ranking #106 of 193 in the ClassWrites Hofstede dataset. That is 5.9 points below the global average and 0.6 points below the Southeast Asia regional average.

A leans restrained profile on this dimension points toward self-control, stronger social norms, and more regulated gratification. In practical analysis, this dimension is useful because it connects broad values to visible patterns in workplaces, classrooms, public institutions, and family expectations.

Use Indulgence as a comparison signal, not a stereotype. Hofstede scores describe national-level tendencies; individuals and organizations inside Philippines can differ sharply by region, class, generation, profession, and local history.

Snapshot

Key Facts

Frequently asked questions

Questions About Philippines's Cultural Profile

What is Philippines's Hofstede cultural dimensions profile?

Philippines has its highest Hofstede score in Power Distance (94) and its lowest score in Long-Term Orientation (27). This profile within Southeast Asia shows how authority, identity, risk, time orientation, competition, and self-expression combine in one national cultural snapshot.

Which Hofstede dimension is highest in Philippines?

Philippines's highest available score is Power Distance at 94.

Which Hofstede dimension is lowest in Philippines?

Philippines's lowest available score is Long-Term Orientation at 27.

Should Hofstede scores be used as stereotypes?

No. Hofstede scores are national-level comparison tools. They can frame research questions, but they should not be used to predict every individual, organization, or community within a country.

How to read these scores: Scores range from 0 to 120. A score above 50 means the country leans toward the high end of that dimension; below 50 means it leans toward the low end. These are national-level tendencies, not individual labels.

Source: Hofstede, G., Hofstede, G. J., & Minkov, M. (2010). Cultures and Organizations: Software of the Mind (3rd ed.). McGraw-Hill.

Academic Foundation

The Researchers Behind the Model

Portrait of Geert Hofstede
Geert Hofstede Pioneered systematic research into national cultural differences through IBM employee data.
Portrait of Gert Jan Hofstede
Gert Jan Hofstede Brought perspectives from biology, information systems, and simulation modelling to the framework.
Portrait of Michael Minkov
Michael Minkov Expanded the model using World Values Survey data and extended its country coverage.

Built for learning. ClassWrites Lab turns published theory into visual study spaces that encourage accuracy, transparency, curiosity, and cultural understanding.

Return to Hofstede Lab
Continue with Google 15% off + volume discounts