ClassWrites Better Grades Start Here
Hofstede Cultural Dimensions Glossary
Donate Support this Lab

Reference glossary

Hofstede Cultural Dimensions Glossary: Key Terms and Definitions

Understanding the language of cross-cultural research. This glossary explains the essential terms used in Hofstede’s cultural dimensions model. Whether you’re a student, researcher, or professional working across cultures, these definitions will help you understand the concepts behind the six dimensions and their practical applications.

All definitions are based on the research presented in Cultures and Organizations: Software of the Mind (3rd Edition, 2010) by Geert Hofstede, Gert Jan Hofstede, and Michael Minkov.

Hofstede Cultural Dimensions Glossary cover illustration
Hofstede Cultural Dimensions Glossary

The six dimensions • 01

Core cultural dimensions

The six dimensions are the backbone of the model. Each one places countries on a spectrum between two poles, describing a shared societal answer to a universal problem.

PDI

Power Distance

Definition
The extent to which the less powerful members of institutions and organizations within a country expect and accept that power is distributed unequally.
In practice
In high power distance cultures, hierarchies are accepted and expected. Subordinates expect to be told what to do and rarely question authority. In low power distance cultures, people strive for equality, question authority, and expect to be consulted in decisions that affect them.
“Power distance can therefore be defined as the extent to which the less powerful members of institutions and organizations within a country expect and accept that power is distributed unequally.”
— Hofstede et al., 2010
IDV

Individualism vs Collectivism

Definition
Individualism pertains to societies in which the ties between individuals are loose: everyone is expected to look after him- or herself and his or her immediate family. Collectivism as its opposite pertains to societies in which people from birth onward are integrated into strong, cohesive in-groups, which throughout people’s lifetime continue to protect them in exchange for unquestioning loyalty.
In practice
In individualist cultures, personal achievement, rights, and freedom are paramount. People define themselves by their individual characteristics. In collectivist cultures, group loyalty, harmony, and collective identity take precedence. People define themselves by their group memberships.
“Individualism pertains to societies in which the ties between individuals are loose: everyone is expected to look after him- or herself and his or her immediate family. Collectivism as its opposite pertains to societies in which people from birth onward are integrated into strong, cohesive in-groups.”
— Hofstede et al., 2010
MAS

Masculinity vs Femininity

Definition
A society is called masculine when emotional gender roles are clearly distinct: men are supposed to be assertive, tough, and focused on material success, whereas women are supposed to be more modest, tender, and concerned with the quality of life. A society is called feminine when emotional gender roles overlap: both men and women are supposed to be modest, tender, and concerned with the quality of life.
In practice
In masculine cultures, competition, achievement, and material success are valued. There are distinct expectations for men and women. In feminine cultures, cooperation, caring, and quality of life are prioritized. Gender roles are more flexible and overlapping.
“A society is called masculine when emotional gender roles are clearly distinct: men are supposed to be assertive, tough, and focused on material success, whereas women are supposed to be more modest, tender, and concerned with the quality of life.”
— Hofstede et al., 2010
UAI

Uncertainty Avoidance Index

Definition
The extent to which the members of a culture feel threatened by ambiguous or unknown situations.
In practice
High uncertainty avoidance cultures have a strong need for rules, structure, and predictability. People feel anxious about ambiguous situations and prefer clear guidelines. Low uncertainty avoidance cultures are more tolerant of ambiguity, change, and unfamiliar situations. They have fewer rules and are more comfortable with risk.
“Uncertainty avoidance can therefore be defined as the extent to which the members of a culture feel threatened by ambiguous or unknown situations.”
— Hofstede et al., 2010
LTO

Long-Term vs Short-Term Orientation

Definition
Long-term orientation stands for the fostering of virtues oriented toward future rewards — in particular, perseverance and thrift. Its opposite pole, short-term orientation, stands for the fostering of virtues related to the past and present — in particular, respect for tradition, preservation of “face,” and fulfilling social obligations.
In practice
Long-term oriented cultures value perseverance, thrift, and adaptation to changing circumstances. People are willing to delay gratification for future success. Short-term oriented cultures value tradition, social obligations, and maintaining face. People focus on present needs and preserving established norms.
“Long-term orientation stands for the fostering of virtues oriented toward future rewards — in particular, perseverance and thrift. Its opposite pole, short-term orientation, stands for the fostering of virtues related to the past and present — in particular, respect for tradition, preservation of “face,” and fulfilling social obligations.”
— Hofstede et al., 2010
IVR

Indulgence vs Restraint

Definition
Indulgence stands for a tendency to allow relatively free gratification of basic and natural human desires related to enjoying life and having fun. Its opposite pole, restraint, reflects a conviction that such gratification needs to be curbed and regulated by strict social norms.
In practice
Indulgent cultures allow people to enjoy life, have fun, and gratify their desires. People feel they have control over their lives and prioritize happiness. Restrained cultures suppress gratification and regulate behavior through strict social norms. People feel less control over their lives and prioritize order and discipline.
“Indulgence stands for a tendency to allow relatively free gratification of basic and natural human desires related to enjoying life and having fun. Its opposite pole, restraint, reflects a conviction that such gratification needs to be curbed and regulated by strict social norms.”
— Hofstede et al., 2010

Foundations of the model • 02

Key theoretical concepts

Culture is often pictured as layers: values sit at the core, while practices — symbols, heroes, and rituals — form the visible surface. These terms describe how that picture works.

Culture

Definition
The collective programming of the mind that distinguishes the members of one group or category of people from others.
In practice
Culture is learned, not inherited. It is acquired from our social environment from birth onward, primarily during childhood. Culture manifests in symbols, heroes, rituals, and values, with values being the deepest and most stable element.
“Culture consists of the unwritten rules of the social game. It is the collective programming of the mind that distinguishes the members of one group or category of people from others.”
— Hofstede et al., 2010

Dimensions of Culture

Definition
An aspect of a culture that can be measured relative to other cultures. Dimensions group together a number of phenomena in a society that were empirically found to occur in combination.
In practice
The six dimensions (PDI, IDV, MAS, UAI, LTO, IVR) provide a framework for comparing national cultures. Each country receives a score on each dimension, representing its relative position. Dimensions are based on statistical analysis of survey data, not on theoretical assumptions.
“A dimension is an aspect of a culture that can be measured relative to other cultures. The grouping of the different aspects of a dimension is always based on statistical relationships — that is, on trends for these phenomena to occur in combination, not on iron links.”
— Hofstede et al., 2010

Values

Definition
Broad tendencies to prefer certain states of affairs over others. Values are feelings with an added arrow indicating a plus and a minus side.
In practice
Values are acquired early in life and are largely unconscious. They deal with fundamental feelings about good and evil, dirty and clean, dangerous and safe, forbidden and permitted, decent and indecent, moral and immoral, ugly and beautiful, unnatural and natural, abnormal and normal, paradoxical and logical, and irrational and rational.
“Values are broad tendencies to prefer certain states of affairs over others. Values are feelings with an added arrow indicating a plus and a minus side.”
— Hofstede et al., 2010

Practices

Definition
The visible part of culture, including symbols, heroes, and rituals. Practices are what people do and how they behave, as distinguished from their underlying values.
In practice
Practices can be observed by outsiders and are learned throughout life. They are more changeable than values. National cultures differ primarily in values, while organizational cultures differ primarily in practices.
“In Figure 1.2 symbols, heroes, and rituals have been subsumed under the term practices. As such they are visible to an outside observer; their cultural meaning, however, is invisible and lies precisely and only in the way these practices are interpreted by the insiders.”
— Hofstede et al., 2010

Symbols

Definition
Words, gestures, pictures, or objects that carry a particular meaning that is recognized as such only by those who share the culture.
In practice
Symbols are the most superficial layer of culture. They include language, jargon, dress, hairstyles, flags, and status symbols. New symbols develop easily and old ones disappear. Symbols from one cultural group are regularly copied by others.
“Symbols are words, gestures, pictures, or objects that carry a particular meaning that is recognized as such only by those who share the culture. The words in a language or jargon belong to this category, as do dress, hairstyles, flags, and status symbols.”
— Hofstede et al., 2010

Heroes

Definition
Persons, alive or dead, real or imaginary, who possess characteristics that are highly prized in a culture and thus serve as models for behavior.
In practice
Heroes represent what a culture admires and aspires to. They can be historical figures, celebrities, sports stars, fictional characters, or even cartoon characters. In modern times, television and social media have made outward appearances more important in the choice of heroes.
“Heroes are persons, alive or dead, real or imaginary, who possess characteristics that are highly prized in a culture and thus serve as models for behavior.”
— Hofstede et al., 2010

Rituals

Definition
Collective activities that are technically superfluous to reach desired ends but that, within a culture, are considered socially essential. They are therefore carried out for their own sake.
In practice
Rituals include ways of greeting, paying respect, social and religious ceremonies, business and political meetings, and discourse patterns. They reinforce group cohesion and cultural identity.
“Rituals are collective activities that are technically superfluous to reach desired ends but that, within a culture, are considered socially essential. They are therefore carried out for their own sake.”
— Hofstede et al., 2010

Who counts as “us” • 03

Group and identity concepts

Collectivist and individualist societies draw very different lines around the self. These terms capture how identity, loyalty, and social control operate on either side of that line.

In-Group

Definition
A cohesive group that offers protection in exchange for loyalty and provides its members with a sense of identity.
In practice
In collectivist societies, the in-group is the major source of one’s identity and the only secure protection one has against the hardships of life. People owe lifelong loyalty to their in-group. Breaking this loyalty is one of the worst things a person can do.
“The “we” group (or in-group) is the major source of one’s identity and the only secure protection one has against the hardships of life. Therefore, one owes lifelong loyalty to one’s in-group, and breaking this loyalty is one of the worst things a person can do.”
— Hofstede et al., 2010

Out-Group

Definition
A group to which one does not belong, often perceived as different and sometimes treated with suspicion or hostility.
In practice
In collectivist societies, the distinction between in-groups and out-groups is sharp. People may be indifferent, inconsiderate, or hostile toward members of out-groups. In individualist societies, the distinction is less pronounced, and people are expected to treat everyone according to universal standards.
“The “we” group is distinct from other people in society who belong to “they” groups, of which there are many.”
— Hofstede et al., 2010

Moral Circle

Definition
The group of all people to whom full moral rights and obligations are granted, usually unconsciously. A moral circle requires a culture.
In practice
People draw mental lines around those they consider to be their group. Only members of the moral circle have full rights and full obligations. The moral circle affects not only symbols, heroes, and rituals but also values. Expanding or contracting the moral circle is a key cultural process.
“People draw a mental line around those whom they consider to be their group. Only members of the moral circle thus delineated have full rights and full obligations.”
— Hofstede et al., 2010

Face

Definition
In collectivist societies, a quality attributed to someone who meets the essential requirements related to his or her social position. To “give face” means to show due respect for that position.
In practice
Face is the proper relationship with one’s social environment. Losing face means being humiliated or failing to meet social requirements. Giving face means showing respect and honoring someone’s social position. Face is a consequence of living in a society that is very conscious of social contexts.
“Face is lost when the individual, either through his action or that of people closely related to him, fails to meet essential requirements placed upon him by virtue of the social position he occupies.”
— David Yau-Fai Ho, cited in Hofstede et al., 2010

Shame

Definition
A social emotion felt when one’s infringement of social rules becomes known to others. Shame is based on a sense of collective obligation.
In practice
In collectivist societies, shame is a powerful mechanism for maintaining social order. Whether shame is felt depends on whether the infringement has become known by others. This contrasts with guilt, which is individual and felt regardless of whether others know about the misdeed.
“Collectivist societies, on the contrary, are shame cultures: persons belonging to a group from which a member has infringed on the rules of society will feel ashamed, based on a sense of collective obligation.”
— Hofstede et al., 2010

Guilt

Definition
An individual emotion felt when one infringes on the rules of society. Guilt is ridden by an individually developed conscience that functions as a private inner pilot.
In practice
In individualist societies, guilt is a primary mechanism for maintaining social order. People feel guilty whether or not their misdeed is known by others. This contrasts with shame, which is social in nature and depends on public knowledge.
“Individualist societies have been described as guilt cultures: persons who infringe on the rules of society will often feel guilty, ridden by an individually developed conscience that functions as a private inner pilot.”
— Hofstede et al., 2010

Encoding meaning • 04

Communication concepts

How much a message needs to be said out loud depends on how much the audience is expected to already know. These terms describe that balance across cultures.

High-Context Communication

Definition
A communication style in which little has to be said or written because most of the information is either in the physical environment or supposed to be known by the persons involved. Very little is in the coded, explicit part of the message.
In practice
High-context communication is frequent in collectivist cultures. People rely on shared understanding, non-verbal cues, and implicit meaning. What is not said may be as important as what is said.
“A high-context communication is one in which little has to be said or written because most of the information is either in the physical environment or supposed to be known by the persons involved, while very little is in the coded, explicit part of the message.”
— Edward T. Hall, cited in Hofstede et al., 2010

Low-Context Communication

Definition
A communication style in which the mass of information is vested in the explicit code. Things that are self-evident in high-context cultures must be said explicitly.
In practice
Low-context communication is typical for individualist cultures. People rely on explicit verbal communication. Contracts are longer and more detailed. What is said is more important than what is not said.
“A low-context communication is one in which the mass of information is vested in the explicit code, which is typical for individualist cultures.”
— Edward T. Hall, cited in Hofstede et al., 2010

Universalism

Definition
A way of thinking prevailing in individualist societies, in which the standards for the way a person should be treated are the same for everybody.
In practice
In universalist cultures, rules and laws apply equally to all. Treating everyone the same is considered ethical. Preferential treatment based on relationships is considered nepotism and is frowned upon.
“In individualist societies, the norm is that one should treat everybody alike. In sociological jargon this is known as universalism.”
— Hofstede et al., 2010

Particularism (Exclusionism)

Definition
A way of thinking prevailing in collectivist societies, in which the standards for the way a person should be treated depend on the group to which the person belongs.
In practice
In particularist cultures, relationships and group memberships matter more than abstract rules. Treating friends and family better than strangers is considered natural and ethical. Universalist standards may be seen as cold and impersonal.
“As the distinction between “our group” and “other groups” is at the very root of people’s consciousness, treating one’s friends better than others is natural and ethical and is a sound business practice.”
— Hofstede et al., 2010

Culture at work • 05

Organizational concepts

National culture and organizational culture are both “collective programming of the mind,” but they are learned at different stages of life and differ in how they change.

Organizational Culture

Definition
The collective programming of the mind that distinguishes the members of one organization from others.
In practice
Organizational cultures are acquired when people enter a work organization as adults. They consist mainly of practices (symbols, heroes, rituals) rather than deep values. Organizational cultures are more changeable than national cultures.
“Organizational culture can be defined as “the collective programming of the mind that distinguishes the members of one organization from others.””
— Hofstede et al., 2010

National Culture

Definition
The collective programming of the mind acquired by growing up in a particular country.
In practice
National cultures are acquired in childhood and contain most of our basic values. They are extremely stable and change only across generations. National cultures differ primarily in values, while organizational cultures differ primarily in practices.
“National cultures are part of the mental software we acquired during the first ten years of our lives, in the family, in the living environment, and in school, and they contain most of our basic values.”
— Hofstede et al., 2010

Corporate Values

Definition
Written statements of desirable principles for corporate behavior. They belong to ideology and are not empirically based on people’s feelings or preferences.
In practice
Corporate values statements are often no more than pious wishful thinking. Corporate cultures are moved not by what top managers say or write, but by who they are and what they do. Unless confirmed by behavioral records and maintained by sanctions, corporate values are worth less than the paper they are written on.
“In our opinion, most corporate values statements are no more than pious wishful thinking, corresponding to one or more top executives’ hobbies. Corporate cultures are moved not by what top managers say or write, but by who they are and what they do.”
— Hofstede et al., 2010

How the numbers are built • 06

Research and methodology concepts

The dimensions exist because of careful statistical work. These terms explain how country scores are derived and checked.

Ecological Factor Analysis

Definition
A statistical technique used to identify dimensions in cross-cultural research. It analyzes the relationships between variables across countries rather than across individuals.
In practice
Ecological factor analysis allows researchers to identify dimensions of national culture by finding patterns in country-level data. It is distinct from individual-level factor analysis, which identifies dimensions of personality.
“This limitation does not apply, however, for ecological factor analyses, in which the score for each case is the mean of a large number of independent observations. In this situation the stability of the factor structure is determined by the number of individuals whose answers went into the mean scores.”
— Hofstede et al., 2010

Correlation

Definition
The degree of common variation of two sets of numbers. The coefficient of correlation can vary from a maximum of 1.00 (perfect agreement) via the value 0 (no relationship) to a minimum of −1.00 (perfect disagreement).
In practice
Correlations are used to identify relationships between cultural dimensions and other variables. A correlation does not prove causation. The predictive power of a correlation decreases with the square of the correlation coefficient.
“The coefficient of correlation expresses the strength of the relationship. If the correlation is perfect, so that one measure follows entirely from the other, the coefficient takes the value 1.00. If the correlation is nonexistent — the two measures are completely unrelated — the coefficient is 0.00.”
— Hofstede et al., 2010

Validation

Definition
Testing the conclusions from one piece of research against data from independent other sources.
In practice
The Hofstede dimensions were validated by correlating country scores with external data such as economic indicators, political measures, and demographic data. Validation strengthens confidence in the findings by showing that the dimensions relate to real-world outcomes.
“The next step was showing the practical implications of the dimension scores for the countries concerned. This was done quantitatively by correlating the dimension scores with other measures that could be logically expected to reflect the same culture differences.”
— Hofstede et al., 2010

Regions that resemble each other • 07

Cultural clusters and groupings

When countries score similarly across several dimensions, researchers often group them into clusters. Clusters summarize patterns without erasing the differences within them.

Cultural Cluster

Definition
A group of countries that share similar cultural profiles across multiple dimensions.
In practice
Cultural clusters help simplify the complexity of global cultural diversity. Examples include the Nordic Cluster, the Anglo Cluster, the Five Dragons, and the Latin American Cluster. Clusters are based on empirical similarities in dimension scores.
“More than fifty countries in the IBM study could, on the basis of their scores on the four dimensions, be sorted into twelve such clusters.”
— Hofstede et al., 2010

Five Dragons

Definition
A term used to describe the five East Asian economies that achieved rapid economic growth in the late 20th century: Japan, South Korea, Taiwan, Hong Kong, and Singapore.
In practice
The Five Dragons share Confucian-influenced values, particularly high long-term orientation, which supports perseverance, thrift, and adaptability. These values have been linked to their economic success.
“The top positions are occupied by China and other East Asian countries. (Japan, Hong Kong, Taiwan, South Korea, and Singapore were known in the last decades of the twentieth century as the “Five Dragons” because of their fast economic growth.)”
— Hofstede et al., 2010

Living and working across cultures • 08

Practical application terms

When people cross cultural boundaries, familiar terms from the research help describe what they experience — and how they can respond.

Culture Shock

Definition
A state of distress following the transfer of a person to an unfamiliar cultural environment. It may be accompanied by physical illness symptoms.
In practice
Culture shock typically follows a pattern: initial euphoria, then distress as real life begins in the new environment, then gradual acculturation, and finally a stable state. Understanding culture shock helps expatriates and travelers prepare for the emotional challenges of cultural adaptation.
“The foreigner usually experiences some form of culture shock... This experience usually leads to feelings of distress, of helplessness, and of hostility toward the new environment.”
— Hofstede et al., 2010

Acculturation

Definition
The process of learning to function in a new cultural environment. It involves adopting some of the local values and practices while maintaining one’s own cultural identity.
In practice
Acculturation is the third phase of the culture shock curve, after euphoria and culture shock. It sets in when the visitor has learned to function under new conditions, has adopted some local values, and has become integrated into a new social network.
“Phase 3, acculturation, sets in when the visitor has slowly learned to function under the new conditions, has adopted some of the local values, finds increased self-confidence, and becomes integrated into a new social network.”
— Hofstede et al., 2010

Biculturality

Definition
The ability to function effectively in two cultural environments. It involves understanding and adapting to the values, practices, and communication styles of both cultures.
In practice
Biculturality is essential for expatriates, international managers, and anyone working across cultural boundaries. It usually requires bilingualism, as language is the vehicle of culture transfer. Task-related biculturality is often sufficient for professional success.
“In multinational business organizations the values and beliefs of the home culture are taken for granted and serve as a frame of reference at the head office. Persons in linchpin roles between foreign subsidiaries and the head office need to be bicultural.”
— Hofstede et al., 2010

Ethnocentrism

Definition
Applying the standards of one’s own society to people outside that society. It is to a people what egocentrism is to an individual: considering one’s own little world to be the center of the universe.
In practice
Ethnocentrism leads to judging other cultures by one’s own standards and finding them lacking. It is a common reaction to cultural differences and can hinder cross-cultural understanding and cooperation.
“Ethnocentrism is to a people what egocentrism is to an individual: considering one’s own little world to be the center of the universe.”
— Hofstede et al., 2010

Cultural Relativism

Definition
The position that one culture has no absolute criteria for judging the activities of another culture as “low” or “noble.” However, every culture can and should apply such judgment to its own activities.
In practice
Cultural relativism calls for suspending judgment when dealing with groups or societies different from one’s own. It does not imply a lack of norms for oneself, nor for one’s society. Information about cultural differences should precede judgment and action.
“Cultural relativism affirms that one culture has no absolute criteria for judging the activities of another culture as “low” or “noble.” However, every culture can and should apply such judgment to its own activities, because its members are actors as well as observers.”
— Claude Lévi-Strauss, cited in Hofstede et al., 2010

Where the data comes from • 09

Research sources and data

The six dimensions were not discovered at once. Each major data source added a layer to the model.

IBM Study

Definition
The original research project conducted by Geert Hofstede in the 1960s and 1970s using survey data from IBM employees in over 50 countries. It identified the first four cultural dimensions: Power Distance, Individualism, Masculinity, and Uncertainty Avoidance.
In practice
The IBM study is the foundation of the Hofstede model. Its strength lies in the fact that the samples were matched on all criteria except nationality, making cultural differences stand out clearly.
“A statistical analysis of the country averages of the answers to questions about the values of similar IBM employees in different countries revealed common problems, but with solutions differing from country to country.”
— Hofstede et al., 2010

Chinese Value Survey (CVS)

Definition
A survey instrument developed by Michael Bond and Chinese colleagues to measure values from an Eastern perspective. It identified the Long-Term Orientation dimension.
In practice
The CVS was designed to avoid Western bias in measuring cultural values. It was administered to students in 23 countries and produced four dimensions, one of which (Long-Term Orientation) was not found in the IBM research.
“Michael Bond, a Canadian having lived and worked in the Far East since 1971, found a creative solution to the Western bias problem. He asked a number of his Chinese colleagues from Hong Kong and Taiwan to help him compose a list of basic values for Chinese people.”
— Hofstede et al., 2010

World Values Survey (WVS)

Definition
A global research project that explores people’s values and beliefs, how they change over time, and what social and political impact they have. It has been conducted in multiple waves since 1981.
In practice
The WVS provided data for extending the Hofstede model to additional countries and for identifying the Indulgence vs Restraint dimension. Michael Minkov’s analysis of WVS data led to the addition of this sixth dimension.
“WVS coordinator Ronald Inglehart, in an initial analysis of his database, announced two main factors, which he called well-being versus survival and secular-rational versus traditional authority. As the following chapters will show, both correlate with our dimension scores.”
— Hofstede et al., 2010

GLOBE Project

Definition
A research project that studied leadership and organizational behavior across cultures. It identified nine cultural dimensions and collected data from managers in over 60 countries.
In practice
The GLOBE project attempted to replicate and extend the Hofstede model. While it produced different dimensions, some of its measures correlate with Hofstede’s dimensions. The two frameworks are complementary but not identical.
“Another large-scale application of the dimensions paradigm is the GLOBE (Global Leadership and Organizational Behavior Effectiveness) project, conceived by U.S. management scholar Robert J. House in 1991.”
— Hofstede et al., 2010

Do cultures move? • 10

Cultural change and stability

Culture is not frozen, but its layers change at very different speeds. These terms clarify what moves quickly and what barely moves at all.

Culture Change

Definition
The process by which cultural values and practices change over time. Culture change can be fast for the outer layers (practices) but slow for the core (values).
In practice
Practices such as symbols, heroes, and rituals can change relatively quickly. Values, learned in childhood and passed from generation to generation, change much more slowly. National value systems should be considered given facts, as hard as a country’s geographical position or its weather.
“Culture change can be fast for the outer layers of the onion diagram, labeled practices... Culture change is slow for the onion’s core, labeled values.”
— Hofstede et al., 2010

Value Stability

Definition
The tendency of cultural values to remain stable over time. Values acquired in childhood are resistant to change and are passed from generation to generation.
In practice
National value systems change slowly, if at all. The IBM national dimension scores have remained valid decades after they were collected. Countries may all move to higher individualism levels as they become wealthier, but their relative positions remain intact.
“A striking fact of the various validations is that correlations do not tend to become weaker over time. The IBM national dimension scores (or at least their relative positions) have remained as valid in the year 2010 as they were around 1970.”
— Hofstede et al., 2010

Frequently asked questions

Terms people often confuse

A quick set of paired definitions for concepts that are easy to mix up.

What is the difference between values and practices?

Values are broad tendencies to prefer certain states of affairs over others. They are learned early in life and are largely unconscious. Practices are the visible part of culture, including symbols, heroes, and rituals. They are what people do and how they behave. National cultures differ primarily in values, while organizational cultures differ primarily in practices.

What is the difference between national culture and organizational culture?

National culture is acquired in childhood and contains most of our basic values. It is extremely stable and changes only across generations. Organizational culture is acquired when people enter a work organization as adults. It consists mainly of practices and is more changeable than national culture.

What is the difference between guilt and shame?

Guilt is an individual emotion felt when one infringes on social rules. It is ridden by an individually developed conscience and is felt whether or not the misdeed is known by others. Shame is a social emotion felt when one’s infringement becomes known to others. It is based on a sense of collective obligation and is more common in collectivist societies.

What is the difference between universalism and particularism?

Universalism is a way of thinking in which standards for treating people are the same for everybody. It prevails in individualist societies. Particularism is a way of thinking in which standards depend on the group to which a person belongs. It prevails in collectivist societies.

What is the difference between high-context and low-context communication?

High-context communication is a style in which little is said or written because most information is in the physical environment or supposed to be known. It is frequent in collectivist cultures. Low-context communication is a style in which the mass of information is in the explicit code. It is typical for individualist cultures.

Sources and further reading

Start with the sources

For academic work, return to the original publications and explain how this glossary informed your analysis.

Primary source

  • Hofstede, G., Hofstede, G. J., & Minkov, M. (2010). Cultures and Organizations: Software of the Mind (3rd ed.). McGraw-Hill.

Related research

  • Hofstede, G. (2001). Culture’s Consequences: Comparing Values, Behaviors, Institutions, and Organizations Across Nations (2nd ed.). Sage.
  • Minkov, M. (2007). What Makes Us Different and Similar: A New Interpretation of the World Values Survey and Other Cross-Cultural Data. Klasika i Stil.
  • Inglehart, R. (1997). Modernization and Postmodernization: Cultural, Economic, and Political Change in 43 Societies. Princeton University Press.
  • Hall, E. T. (1976). Beyond Culture. Doubleday.

Academic Foundation

The Researchers Behind the Model

Portrait of Geert Hofstede
Geert Hofstede Pioneered systematic research into national cultural differences through IBM employee data.
Portrait of Gert Jan Hofstede
Gert Jan Hofstede Brought perspectives from biology, information systems, and simulation modelling to the framework.
Portrait of Michael Minkov
Michael Minkov Expanded the model using World Values Survey data and extended its country coverage.

Built for learning. ClassWrites Lab turns published theory into visual study spaces that encourage accuracy, transparency, curiosity, and cultural understanding.

Return to Hofstede Lab
Continue with Google 15% off + volume discounts