Cultural cluster analysis

Oceania: Hofstede Cultural Dimensions Analysis

Explore the shared cultural profile of the Oceania, a group of 14 countries with closely related Hofstede dimension scores. The analysis below is based on Cultures and Organizations: Software of the Mind (Hofstede, Hofstede, & Minkov, 2010) and covers all six cultural dimensions.

Pacific island nations: Australia, New Zealand, Fiji, Kiribati, Samoa, Tonga, etc. Characterized by moderate-to-low PDI, moderate-to-high IDV, low-to-moderate UAI, and high IVR.

Cultural cluster illustration — Cultural Clusters Analysis

Choose a cluster

Summary

Cluster Summary

Compared with the global average, the Oceania stands out most on Individualism and Indulgence — where its members score higher than the world average — and on Long-Term Orientation and Uncertainty Avoidance, where they score lower. These are the dimensions that give the cluster its distinctive cultural identity.

Dimension	Cluster Average	Global Average	Difference	Level
Power Distance (PDI)	59.9	65.8	-5.9	High
Individualism (IDV)	42.1	35.4	+6.7	Low
Masculinity (MAS)	47.1	49.4	-2.3	Moderate
Uncertainty Avoidance (UAI)	50.0	60.1	-10.1	Moderate
Long-Term Orientation (LTO)	29.6	36.5	-6.9	Very low
Indulgence (IVR)	53.3	47.8	+5.5	Moderate

Dimension by dimension

Dimension-by-Dimension Analysis

PDI

Power Distance Index in the Oceania

Cluster average: 59.9 (range: 22–65, std. dev.: 12.9) — ranked #10 of 16 clusters worldwide.

High score meaning: Accepts hierarchy and unequal power distribution

Low score meaning: Prefers equality and questions authority

Book definition: The extent to which the less powerful members of institutions and organizations within a country expect and accept that power is distributed unequally.

On the Power Distance Index dimension, the Oceania averages 59.9, which is 5.9 points below the global average of 65.8. This places the cluster at a high level on this dimension. Within the cluster, Fiji scores highest (65) and New Zealand scores lowest (22), showing a range of 43 points.

Highest in cluster: Fiji (65) | Lowest in cluster: New Zealand (22)

IDV

Individualism vs Collectivism in the Oceania

Cluster average: 42.1 (range: 35–90, std. dev.: 17.4) — ranked #6 of 16 clusters worldwide.

High score meaning: Individual rights and self-reliance valued

Low score meaning: Strong group loyalty and collective identity

Book definition: Individualism pertains to societies in which the ties between individuals are loose; collectivism to societies in which people are integrated into strong, cohesive in-groups.

On the Individualism vs Collectivism dimension, the Oceania averages 42.1, which is 6.7 points above the global average of 35.4. This places the cluster at a low level on this dimension. Within the cluster, Australia scores highest (90) and Vanuatu scores lowest (35), showing a range of 55 points.

Highest in cluster: Australia (90) | Lowest in cluster: Vanuatu (35)

MAS

Masculinity vs Femininity in the Oceania

Cluster average: 47.1 (range: 45–61, std. dev.: 5.1) — ranked #12 of 16 clusters worldwide.

High score meaning: Assertive, competitive, achievement-oriented

Low score meaning: Modest, caring, quality-of-life oriented

Book definition: A society is called masculine when emotional gender roles are clearly distinct; feminine when emotional gender roles overlap.

On the Masculinity vs Femininity dimension, the Oceania averages 47.1, which is 2.3 points below the global average of 49.4. This places the cluster at a moderate level on this dimension. Within the cluster, Australia scores highest (61) and Vanuatu scores lowest (45), showing a range of 16 points.

Highest in cluster: Australia (61) | Lowest in cluster: Vanuatu (45)

UAI

Uncertainty Avoidance Index in the Oceania

Cluster average: 50.0 (range: 49–51, std. dev.: 0.4) — ranked #11 of 16 clusters worldwide.

High score meaning: Strong need for rules, structure, and predictability

Low score meaning: Tolerant of ambiguity and unstructured situations

Book definition: The extent to which the members of a culture feel threatened by ambiguous or unknown situations.

On the Uncertainty Avoidance Index dimension, the Oceania averages 50.0, which is 10.1 points below the global average of 60.1. This places the cluster at a moderate level on this dimension. Within the cluster, Australia scores highest (51) and New Zealand scores lowest (49), showing a range of 2 points.

Highest in cluster: Australia (51) | Lowest in cluster: New Zealand (49)

LTO

Long-Term vs Short-Term Orientation in the Oceania

Cluster average: 29.6 (range: 21–33, std. dev.: 2.5) — ranked #12 of 16 clusters worldwide.

High score meaning: Perseverance, thrift, future rewards

Low score meaning: Tradition, face, present social obligations

Book definition: Long-term orientation stands for the fostering of virtues oriented toward future rewards, in particular perseverance and thrift.

On the Long-Term vs Short-Term Orientation dimension, the Oceania averages 29.6, which is 6.9 points below the global average of 36.5. This places the cluster at a very low level on this dimension. Within the cluster, New Zealand scores highest (33) and Australia scores lowest (21), showing a range of 12 points.

Highest in cluster: New Zealand (33) | Lowest in cluster: Australia (21)

IVR

Indulgence vs Restraint in the Oceania

Cluster average: 53.3 (range: 50–75, std. dev.: 8.1) — ranked #5 of 16 clusters worldwide.

High score meaning: Free gratification, enjoyment of life, fun

Low score meaning: Strict social norms, restraint of desires

Book definition: Indulgence stands for a tendency to allow relatively free gratification of basic and natural human desires related to enjoying life and having fun.

On the Indulgence vs Restraint dimension, the Oceania averages 53.3, which is 5.5 points above the global average of 47.8. This places the cluster at a moderate level on this dimension. Within the cluster, New Zealand scores highest (75) and Vanuatu scores lowest (50), showing a range of 25 points.

Highest in cluster: New Zealand (75) | Lowest in cluster: Vanuatu (50)

Full dataset

Country Scores in the Oceania

The table below lists every country in this cluster with its six dimension scores. Click any country name to open its full cultural profile.

Country	PDI	IDV	MAS	UAI	LTO	IVR
Australia	36	90	61	51	21	71
Fiji	65	35	45	50	30	50
Kiribati	65	35	45	50	30	50
Marshall Islands	65	35	45	50	30	50
Micronesia	65	35	45	50	30	50
Nauru	65	35	45	50	30	50
New Zealand	22	79	58	49	33	75
Palau	65	35	45	50	30	50
Papua New Guinea	65	35	45	50	30	50
Samoa	65	35	45	50	30	50
Solomon Islands	65	35	45	50	30	50
Tonga	65	35	45	50	30	50
Tuvalu	65	35	45	50	30	50
Vanuatu	65	35	45	50	30	50

Regional standing

How the Oceania Compares to Other Clusters

For each dimension, we rank this cluster against all other cultural clusters in the dataset. A rank of #1 means the cluster has the highest average on that dimension worldwide.

Dimension	Cluster Average	Rank Among Clusters
Power Distance	59.9	#10 of 16
Individualism	42.1	#6 of 16
Masculinity	47.1	#12 of 16
Uncertainty Avoidance	50.0	#11 of 16
Long-Term Orientation	29.6	#12 of 16
Indulgence	53.3	#5 of 16

Practical implications

Practical Implications

What This Cluster Means in Business

Companies operating across the Oceania should design management practices that respect its dominant values. The cluster averages on Individualism and Long-Term Orientation predict how meetings, deadlines, and negotiations will typically unfold.

What This Cluster Means in Education

For students and educators moving within the Oceania, expect shared assumptions about classroom participation, respect for teachers, and attitudes toward deadlines. Differences from other regions will be most visible on Individualism.

What This Cluster Means in Diplomacy

Negotiators working with partners from the Oceania benefit from understanding the cluster-wide tendencies on Individualism and Long-Term Orientation. These shared patterns allow a single cultural briefing to cover multiple countries in the region.

Frequently asked questions

Frequently Asked Questions

What defines the Oceania?

The cluster is defined by empirically similar scores across multiple Hofstede dimensions. The countries in this cluster share enough cultural characteristics to be grouped together, though individual countries still differ in important ways.

Which dimension is most distinctive in the Oceania?

The most distinctive dimension is Individualism vs Collectivism, where this cluster scores furthest above the global average.

Where is this cluster most similar to the global average?

The cluster is closest to the global average on Uncertainty Avoidance Index.

Do all countries in the cluster share the same culture?

No. Clusters describe central tendencies. Within every cluster there is meaningful variation between countries, as the range and standard deviation figures above show.

How can I use cluster data for teaching or research?

Use clusters to simplify comparison and identify regional patterns. Always cite the primary source: Hofstede, G., Hofstede, G. J., & Minkov, M. (2010). Cultures and Organizations: Software of the Mind (3rd ed.). McGraw-Hill.

Explore further

Explore Further

Countries in this cluster

Academic Foundation

The Researchers Behind the Model

Geert Hofstede Pioneered systematic research into national cultural differences through IBM employee data.

Gert Jan Hofstede Brought perspectives from biology, information systems, and simulation modelling to the framework.

Michael Minkov Expanded the model using World Values Survey data and extended its country coverage.

Built for learning. ClassWrites Lab turns published theory into visual study spaces that encourage accuracy, transparency, curiosity, and cultural understanding.

Return to Hofstede Lab