ClassWrites Better Grades Start Here
Cultural Dimensions Analysis Tool
Donate Support this Lab

North America

Canada Hofstede Cultural Dimensions

Canada has its highest Hofstede score in Individualism (80) and its lowest score in Long-Term Orientation (36). This profile within North America shows how authority, identity, risk, time orientation, competition, and self-expression combine in one national cultural snapshot.

Country dimension analysis illustration
Cultural Dimensions Analysis Tool

At a glance

Dimension Scores at a Glance

PDI

Power Distance

Leans egalitarian
39 / 120
#184 of 200 Global avg: 65.9 North America avg: 44.3
IDV

Individualism

High individualism
80 / 120
#4 of 203 Global avg: 35 North America avg: 81.3
MAS

Masculinity

Moderate masculinity
52 / 120
#57 of 194 Global avg: 49.2 North America avg: 53
UAI

Uncertainty Avoidance

Moderate uncertainty avoidance
48 / 120
#170 of 205 Global avg: 60 North America avg: 51.3
LTO

Long-Term Orientation

Leans short-term oriented
36 / 120
#79 of 196 Global avg: 36.6 North America avg: 31
IVR

Indulgence

High indulgence
68 / 120
#37 of 193 Global avg: 47.9 North America avg: 68

Practical implications

What This Means

Business

Canada business analysis should start with the country score pattern rather than a single dimension. Its strongest signal is Individualism (80), so negotiations, planning, and leadership expectations should be read through that lens. Lower uncertainty avoidance can make experimentation and flexible execution easier to discuss.

Education

For education and student research, Canada is useful for comparing how cultural values shape classroom authority, group work, time horizons, and motivation. A lower power distance score suggests more participative classroom expectations may be plausible. Higher individualism points toward personal initiative and individual achievement.

Society

For social analysis, the profile helps explain broad patterns without reducing people to a score. A lower long-term orientation can place more weight on tradition, present obligations, and faster visible outcomes. The lowest score, Long-Term Orientation (36), is just as important because it shows where the country leans away from the high pole of the model.

Each dimension in context

Dimension Deep Dive

PDI

Power Distance

Canada scores 39 on Power Distance, ranking #184 of 200 in the ClassWrites Hofstede dataset. That is 26.9 points below the global average and 5.3 points below the North America regional average.

A leans egalitarian profile on this dimension points toward flatter authority, consultation, and easier access to decision makers. In practical analysis, this dimension is useful because it connects broad values to visible patterns in workplaces, classrooms, public institutions, and family expectations.

Use Power Distance as a comparison signal, not a stereotype. Hofstede scores describe national-level tendencies; individuals and organizations inside Canada can differ sharply by region, class, generation, profession, and local history.

IDV

Individualism

Canada scores 80 on Individualism, ranking #4 of 203 in the ClassWrites Hofstede dataset. That is 45 points above the global average and 1.3 points below the North America regional average.

A high individualism profile on this dimension points toward personal autonomy, individual accountability, and direct expression of preferences. In practical analysis, this dimension is useful because it connects broad values to visible patterns in workplaces, classrooms, public institutions, and family expectations.

Use Individualism as a comparison signal, not a stereotype. Hofstede scores describe national-level tendencies; individuals and organizations inside Canada can differ sharply by region, class, generation, profession, and local history.

MAS

Masculinity

Canada scores 52 on Masculinity, ranking #57 of 194 in the ClassWrites Hofstede dataset. That is 2.8 points above the global average and 1 points below the North America regional average.

A moderate masculinity profile on this dimension points toward competition, performance, ambition, and visible achievement. In practical analysis, this dimension is useful because it connects broad values to visible patterns in workplaces, classrooms, public institutions, and family expectations.

Use Masculinity as a comparison signal, not a stereotype. Hofstede scores describe national-level tendencies; individuals and organizations inside Canada can differ sharply by region, class, generation, profession, and local history.

UAI

Uncertainty Avoidance

Canada scores 48 on Uncertainty Avoidance, ranking #170 of 205 in the ClassWrites Hofstede dataset. That is 12 points below the global average and 3.3 points below the North America regional average.

A moderate uncertainty avoidance profile on this dimension points toward comfort with ambiguity, experimentation, and lighter rule systems. In practical analysis, this dimension is useful because it connects broad values to visible patterns in workplaces, classrooms, public institutions, and family expectations.

Use Uncertainty Avoidance as a comparison signal, not a stereotype. Hofstede scores describe national-level tendencies; individuals and organizations inside Canada can differ sharply by region, class, generation, profession, and local history.

LTO

Long-Term Orientation

Canada scores 36 on Long-Term Orientation, ranking #79 of 196 in the ClassWrites Hofstede dataset. That is 0.6 points below the global average and 5 points above the North America regional average.

A leans short-term oriented profile on this dimension points toward respect for tradition, quick visible outcomes, and present social obligations. In practical analysis, this dimension is useful because it connects broad values to visible patterns in workplaces, classrooms, public institutions, and family expectations.

Use Long-Term Orientation as a comparison signal, not a stereotype. Hofstede scores describe national-level tendencies; individuals and organizations inside Canada can differ sharply by region, class, generation, profession, and local history.

IVR

Indulgence

Canada scores 68 on Indulgence, ranking #37 of 193 in the ClassWrites Hofstede dataset. That is 20.1 points above the global average and aligned with the North America regional average.

A high indulgence profile on this dimension points toward leisure, optimism, self-expression, and greater freedom to enjoy life. In practical analysis, this dimension is useful because it connects broad values to visible patterns in workplaces, classrooms, public institutions, and family expectations.

Use Indulgence as a comparison signal, not a stereotype. Hofstede scores describe national-level tendencies; individuals and organizations inside Canada can differ sharply by region, class, generation, profession, and local history.

Snapshot

Key Facts

Frequently asked questions

Questions About Canada's Cultural Profile

What is Canada's Hofstede cultural dimensions profile?

Canada has its highest Hofstede score in Individualism (80) and its lowest score in Long-Term Orientation (36). This profile within North America shows how authority, identity, risk, time orientation, competition, and self-expression combine in one national cultural snapshot.

Which Hofstede dimension is highest in Canada?

Canada's highest available score is Individualism at 80.

Which Hofstede dimension is lowest in Canada?

Canada's lowest available score is Long-Term Orientation at 36.

Should Hofstede scores be used as stereotypes?

No. Hofstede scores are national-level comparison tools. They can frame research questions, but they should not be used to predict every individual, organization, or community within a country.

How to read these scores: Scores range from 0 to 120. A score above 50 means the country leans toward the high end of that dimension; below 50 means it leans toward the low end. These are national-level tendencies, not individual labels.

Source: Hofstede, G., Hofstede, G. J., & Minkov, M. (2010). Cultures and Organizations: Software of the Mind (3rd ed.). McGraw-Hill.

Academic Foundation

The Researchers Behind the Model

Portrait of Geert Hofstede
Geert Hofstede Pioneered systematic research into national cultural differences through IBM employee data.
Portrait of Gert Jan Hofstede
Gert Jan Hofstede Brought perspectives from biology, information systems, and simulation modelling to the framework.
Portrait of Michael Minkov
Michael Minkov Expanded the model using World Values Survey data and extended its country coverage.

Built for learning. ClassWrites Lab turns published theory into visual study spaces that encourage accuracy, transparency, curiosity, and cultural understanding.

Return to Hofstede Lab
Continue with Google 15% off + volume discounts