ClassWrites Better Grades Start Here
Cultural Dimensions Analysis Tool
Donate Support this Lab

Southeast Asia

Indonesia Hofstede Cultural Dimensions

Indonesia has its highest Hofstede score in Power Distance (78) and its lowest score in Individualism (14). This profile within Southeast Asia shows how authority, identity, risk, time orientation, competition, and self-expression combine in one national cultural snapshot.

Country dimension analysis illustration
Cultural Dimensions Analysis Tool

At a glance

Dimension Scores at a Glance

PDI

Power Distance

High power distance
78 / 120
#36 of 200 Global avg: 65.9 Southeast Asia avg: 76.4
IDV

Individualism

Very collectivist
14 / 120
#197 of 203 Global avg: 35 Southeast Asia avg: 25.6
MAS

Masculinity

Moderate masculinity
46 / 120
#94 of 194 Global avg: 49.2 Southeast Asia avg: 48.7
UAI

Uncertainty Avoidance

Moderate uncertainty avoidance
48 / 120
#170 of 205 Global avg: 60 Southeast Asia avg: 39.1
LTO

Long-Term Orientation

Moderate long-term orientation
62 / 120
#30 of 196 Global avg: 36.6 Southeast Asia avg: 48.4
IVR

Indulgence

Leans restrained
38 / 120
#117 of 193 Global avg: 47.9 Southeast Asia avg: 42.6

Practical implications

What This Means

Business

Indonesia business analysis should start with the country score pattern rather than a single dimension. Its strongest signal is Power Distance (78), so negotiations, planning, and leadership expectations should be read through that lens. Lower uncertainty avoidance can make experimentation and flexible execution easier to discuss.

Education

For education and student research, Indonesia is useful for comparing how cultural values shape classroom authority, group work, time horizons, and motivation. A higher power distance score suggests formal respect for teachers and institutional hierarchy may be important. Lower individualism points toward group belonging and shared responsibility.

Society

For social analysis, the profile helps explain broad patterns without reducing people to a score. A stronger long-term orientation can support patience, adaptation, and future-focused planning. The lowest score, Individualism (14), is just as important because it shows where the country leans away from the high pole of the model.

Each dimension in context

Dimension Deep Dive

PDI

Power Distance

Indonesia scores 78 on Power Distance, ranking #36 of 200 in the ClassWrites Hofstede dataset. That is 12.1 points above the global average and 1.6 points above the Southeast Asia regional average.

A high power distance profile on this dimension points toward clear hierarchy, respect for seniority, and more centralized authority. In practical analysis, this dimension is useful because it connects broad values to visible patterns in workplaces, classrooms, public institutions, and family expectations.

Use Power Distance as a comparison signal, not a stereotype. Hofstede scores describe national-level tendencies; individuals and organizations inside Indonesia can differ sharply by region, class, generation, profession, and local history.

IDV

Individualism

Indonesia scores 14 on Individualism, ranking #197 of 203 in the ClassWrites Hofstede dataset. That is 21 points below the global average and 11.6 points below the Southeast Asia regional average.

A very collectivist profile on this dimension points toward group loyalty, relationship obligations, and decisions shaped by in-group expectations. In practical analysis, this dimension is useful because it connects broad values to visible patterns in workplaces, classrooms, public institutions, and family expectations.

Use Individualism as a comparison signal, not a stereotype. Hofstede scores describe national-level tendencies; individuals and organizations inside Indonesia can differ sharply by region, class, generation, profession, and local history.

MAS

Masculinity

Indonesia scores 46 on Masculinity, ranking #94 of 194 in the ClassWrites Hofstede dataset. That is 3.2 points below the global average and 2.7 points below the Southeast Asia regional average.

A moderate masculinity profile on this dimension points toward consensus, quality of life, care, and modest achievement norms. In practical analysis, this dimension is useful because it connects broad values to visible patterns in workplaces, classrooms, public institutions, and family expectations.

Use Masculinity as a comparison signal, not a stereotype. Hofstede scores describe national-level tendencies; individuals and organizations inside Indonesia can differ sharply by region, class, generation, profession, and local history.

UAI

Uncertainty Avoidance

Indonesia scores 48 on Uncertainty Avoidance, ranking #170 of 205 in the ClassWrites Hofstede dataset. That is 12 points below the global average and 8.9 points above the Southeast Asia regional average.

A moderate uncertainty avoidance profile on this dimension points toward comfort with ambiguity, experimentation, and lighter rule systems. In practical analysis, this dimension is useful because it connects broad values to visible patterns in workplaces, classrooms, public institutions, and family expectations.

Use Uncertainty Avoidance as a comparison signal, not a stereotype. Hofstede scores describe national-level tendencies; individuals and organizations inside Indonesia can differ sharply by region, class, generation, profession, and local history.

LTO

Long-Term Orientation

Indonesia scores 62 on Long-Term Orientation, ranking #30 of 196 in the ClassWrites Hofstede dataset. That is 25.4 points above the global average and 13.6 points above the Southeast Asia regional average.

A moderate long-term orientation profile on this dimension points toward perseverance, thrift, adaptation, and patient investment in future rewards. In practical analysis, this dimension is useful because it connects broad values to visible patterns in workplaces, classrooms, public institutions, and family expectations.

Use Long-Term Orientation as a comparison signal, not a stereotype. Hofstede scores describe national-level tendencies; individuals and organizations inside Indonesia can differ sharply by region, class, generation, profession, and local history.

IVR

Indulgence

Indonesia scores 38 on Indulgence, ranking #117 of 193 in the ClassWrites Hofstede dataset. That is 9.9 points below the global average and 4.6 points below the Southeast Asia regional average.

A leans restrained profile on this dimension points toward self-control, stronger social norms, and more regulated gratification. In practical analysis, this dimension is useful because it connects broad values to visible patterns in workplaces, classrooms, public institutions, and family expectations.

Use Indulgence as a comparison signal, not a stereotype. Hofstede scores describe national-level tendencies; individuals and organizations inside Indonesia can differ sharply by region, class, generation, profession, and local history.

Snapshot

Key Facts

Frequently asked questions

Questions About Indonesia's Cultural Profile

What is Indonesia's Hofstede cultural dimensions profile?

Indonesia has its highest Hofstede score in Power Distance (78) and its lowest score in Individualism (14). This profile within Southeast Asia shows how authority, identity, risk, time orientation, competition, and self-expression combine in one national cultural snapshot.

Which Hofstede dimension is highest in Indonesia?

Indonesia's highest available score is Power Distance at 78.

Which Hofstede dimension is lowest in Indonesia?

Indonesia's lowest available score is Individualism at 14.

Should Hofstede scores be used as stereotypes?

No. Hofstede scores are national-level comparison tools. They can frame research questions, but they should not be used to predict every individual, organization, or community within a country.

How to read these scores: Scores range from 0 to 120. A score above 50 means the country leans toward the high end of that dimension; below 50 means it leans toward the low end. These are national-level tendencies, not individual labels.

Source: Hofstede, G., Hofstede, G. J., & Minkov, M. (2010). Cultures and Organizations: Software of the Mind (3rd ed.). McGraw-Hill.

Academic Foundation

The Researchers Behind the Model

Portrait of Geert Hofstede
Geert Hofstede Pioneered systematic research into national cultural differences through IBM employee data.
Portrait of Gert Jan Hofstede
Gert Jan Hofstede Brought perspectives from biology, information systems, and simulation modelling to the framework.
Portrait of Michael Minkov
Michael Minkov Expanded the model using World Values Survey data and extended its country coverage.

Built for learning. ClassWrites Lab turns published theory into visual study spaces that encourage accuracy, transparency, curiosity, and cultural understanding.

Return to Hofstede Lab
Continue with Google 15% off + volume discounts